PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H57M-USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100825 |
Uptime | 0.8 Days |
Run Date | May 12 '20 at 14:59 |
Run Duration | 138 Seconds |
Run User | GRC-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5 760-$100
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
|
56.5%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87
|
28.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 36 76 85 96 96 MB/s
|
28.9%
Poor
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
436GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 83 93 93 96 96 MB/s
|
57.5%
Above average
|
|||
Hitachi HDS72101 1TB
98GB free, PID 1013
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 75 75 75 75 MB/s
|
30.4%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
32.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples | 13x |
Core i3 530Intel $45Bench 46%, 16,724 samples | 10x |
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples | 9x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 8x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 5x |
R7 260XAMD $120Bench 20%, 38,521 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 69% - Good | Total price: $101 |