Acer Aspire Z1-211

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire Z1-211  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire Z1-211
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151016
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 11 '20 at 12:37
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-7010 APU (2015 M.Ca)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Memory 40
1-Core 21.9
2-Core 42.8
23% 34.9 Pts
4-Core 42.6
8-Core 39.9
6% 41.2 Pts
64-Core 39.9
2% 39.9 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Acer(1025 103C) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 17.12.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.41% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 3.27
Parallax 1.91
1% 2.23 fps
MRender 2.52
Gravity 1.17
Splatting 2.61
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.41%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 133 129 137 147 246 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.2% Average
Read 219
Write 114
Mixed 158
SusWrite 166
37% 164 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 28.5
4K Mixed 17.6
66% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 45.4
DQ Write 49.4
DQ Mixed 40.9
33% 45.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair SODIM DDR3 1600 C11 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 5
12% 4.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.23 GB/s
Latency 202
20% 202 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback