Intel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset
Performance Results
| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 3.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Intel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset (all builds) |
| Memory | 3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180424 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 02 '20 at 12:23 |
| Run Duration | 120 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 6% |
PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
70.5%
Very good
|
65% 106 Pts
|
44% 363 Pts
|
34% 552 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
|
3.07%
Terrible
|
0% 6.72 fps
|
9% 11.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$26
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 88 96 86 84 MB/s
|
57.4%
Above average
|
69% 94.2 MB/s
|
183% 1.33 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
0GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 182 182 181 182 181 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
112% 154 MB/s
|
157% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393B5170GB0- 2x4GB
2 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
|
60.2%
Good
|
64% 22.2 GB/s
|
33% 11.6 GB/s
|
62% 64.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 458 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Intel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples | 98x |
| Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples | 62x |
| Xeon E5-2640 0IntelBench 65%, 3,274 samples | 37x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 30x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 30x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 25x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 44% - Average | Total price: $92 |