Hp-pavilion FR516AA-AB9 m9475pt

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	50% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion FR516AA-AB9 m9475pt (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON Benicia
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090910
Uptime	13.8 Days
Run Date	May 01 '20 at 12:40
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	44.5% Average	Memory 70.8 1-Core 27.5 2-Core 54.8 36% 51 Pts	4-Core 108 8-Core 109 14% 108 Pts	64-Core 109 7% 109 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 2,160 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 0294) 512MB Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.632.1.2000 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	5.03% Terrible	Lighting 6.1 Reflection 9.42 Parallax 3.81 5% 6.45 fps	MRender 5.62 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 8.48 5% 6 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.03% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 22,748 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 115 94 93 93 94 MB/s Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	50% Above average	Read 218 Write 115 Mixed 203 SusWrite 106 36% 160 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 40.6 4K Mixed 25.3 88% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 114 102% 154 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 94%
WD WD3200AVJS-63WDA0 320GB 7,100 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 253GB free Firmware: 01.03A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 93 96 95 96 98 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	59% Above average	Read 110 Write 105 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 95.8 69% 93.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 59%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 116 142 144 135 146 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	77% Very good	Read 145 Write 70.5 Mixed 64 SusWrite 123 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 141% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 86%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB 1,144 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 3TB free, PID ab38 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	18.7% Very poor	Read 27 Write 25.8 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 18.6 32% 24 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.6 141% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 72%
Intenso External USB 3.0 3TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1.5TB free, PID 0711 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	13.8% Very poor	Read 31.3 Write 28.3 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 18.9 36% 26.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 78% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.6% Very poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 4.6 MC Mixed 4.9 16% 5.43 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 5.5 14% 4.97 GB/s	Latency 99.5 40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Hp-pavilion FR516AA-AB9 m9475pt

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)