Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T5870 2,085 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	22.1% Poor	Memory 38.2 1-Core 22.3 2-Core 41.6 22% 34 Pts	4-Core 36.8 8-Core 37.5 5% 37.2 Pts	64-Core 37.9 2% 37.9 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI RADEON XPRESS 200M Asus(1043 1402) 128MB Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.383.0.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Lighting 0.1 Reflection 0.19 0% 0.15 fps

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Maxtor Z1 SSD 240GB 1,683 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 149GB free (System drive) Firmware: STKSF010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 104 119 118 119 122 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.5% Below average	Read 174 Write 134 Mixed 139 SusWrite 122 32% 142 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 27.8 4K Mixed 19.3 66% 21.5 MB/s	DQ Read 23.7 DQ Write 48.4 DQ Mixed 30.5 25% 34.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 86%
Verbatim STORE N GO 4GB 2,873 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 4GB free, PID 0302 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.2 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.2 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	3.4% Terrible	Read 11.7 Write 6.2 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 6.3 9% 7.18 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 5% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.4% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	6.25% Terrible	MC Read 2.2 MC Write 1.7 MC Mixed 1.3 5% 1.73 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 0.9 6% 1.93 GB/s	Latency 211 19% 211 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 6.25% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16