Clevo M570U

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Clevo M570U (all builds)
Motherboard	Clevo CAPELL VALLEY(NAPA) CRB
Memory	0.6 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20060809
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '17 at 21:59
Run Duration	524 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	41%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 T7400-$110 673 User benchmarks, average bench 33% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	Memory 34.9 1-Core 15.1 2-Core 33.9 19% 28 Pts	4-Core 24.9 8-Core 21.5 3% 23.2 Pts	64-Core 27.8 2% 27.8 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 38%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$30 168,449 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 266GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0003SDM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 99 36740504 (03) Spinup time 99 98 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3394 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 32 (07) Seek error rate 70 57 25842560056 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 -42730629625176 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 994 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 91 91 9 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032848 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 48 40 198442418228 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1839 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 48 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 87 87 27574 (C2) HDA temperature 52 60 51539607604 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 57 (F0) Head flying hours 97 97 -55405078115732 (F1) Unknown 100 253 6853017485 (F2) Unknown 100 253 16573519627 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	37.7% Below average	Read 67.9 Write 63.8 Mixed 14.4 35% 48.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.02 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.02 4% 0.02 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 61%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 1,913 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	3.25% Terrible	Read 17.7 Write 3.05 Mixed 5.05 8% 8.59 MB/s	4K Read 0.03 4K Write 0.006 4K Mixed 0.007 0% 0.01 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.25% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	6.06% Terrible	MC Read 1.9 MC Write 2.2 MC Mixed 1.5 5% 1.87 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 0.3 SC Mixed 0.9 3% 1.13 GB/s	Latency 228 18% 228 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 6.06% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $125	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Clevo M570U

Performance Results

PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)