| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 5.57% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20141202 |
| Uptime | 1.3 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 03 '20 at 08:51 |
| Run Duration | 137 Seconds |
| Run User | PER-User |
| Background CPU | 85% |
PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
55.4%
Above average
|
49% 74.9 Pts
|
26% 199 Pts
|
15% 236 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28%
Poor
|
28% 31.8 fps
|
28% 35 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32070RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 14 21 17 12 19 MB/s
|
5.57%
Terrible
|
7% 31.8 MB/s
|
7% 2.43 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
119GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 44 87 74 59 29 MB/s
|
33% 46.1 MB/s
|
70% 0.25 MB/s
| ||
|
SanDisk Ultra Fit 123GB
70GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 9.5 13 12 8.4 10 MB/s
|
5.88%
Terrible
|
17% 13.2 MB/s
|
21% 0.23 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
|
41.6%
Average
|
43% 15.1 GB/s
|
24% 8.33 GB/s
|
49% 81.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A78L-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,854 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 - $53
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 505x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 324x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 185x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 139x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 127x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 90x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $138 |