Asrock A320M-DGS

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	50.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock A320M-DGS (all builds)
Memory	5.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180103
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Apr 02 '20 at 17:36
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	34%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$125 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Memory 67.8 1-Core 108 2-Core 207 71% 128 Pts	4-Core 361 8-Core 621 60% 491 Pts	64-Core 734 45% 734 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (62 fps cap detected)	50.6% Above average	Lighting 61.9 Reflection 62.2 Parallax 53.4 50% 59.2 fps	MRender 62.3 Gravity 60.7 Splatting 63 51% 62 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
INTENSO 512GB 2,578 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM11.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 116 105 38 50 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	Read 363 Write 242 Mixed 308 SusWrite 77.6 55% 248 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 17.5 4K Mixed 1.5 58% 16.6 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 23.7 DQ Mixed 17.7 34% 73.3 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 96%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 875GB free Firmware: MS2OA8J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 176 178 179 181 180 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	97.5% Outstanding	Read 161 Write 170 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 179 98% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2133 C15 1x16GB 1,705 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	28.3% Poor	MC Read 11 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 10.1 27% 9.43 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 9.4 26% 8.97 GB/s	Latency 107 38% 107 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-DGS Builds (Compare 450 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-DGS

CPU
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples	67x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	64x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	49x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	80x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	34x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	20x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	19x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	11x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	11x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	16x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	12x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $187

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16