Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom 9750 1,906 User benchmarks, average bench 44% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	51.3% Above average	Memory 78.6 1-Core 32.2 2-Core 71 42% 60.6 Pts	4-Core 142 8-Core 142 19% 142 Pts	64-Core 140 9% 140 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 51%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18 39,749 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 277GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 67 63 56 65 63 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	40.1% Average	Read 75 Write 75.3 Mixed 48 SusWrite 64.8 48% 65.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.4 82% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 47%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power16G 16GB 641 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 14GB free, PID 4100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 2.5 2.9 2.8 3.3 3.2 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	4.3% Terrible	Read 18.3 Write 10.3 Mixed 6.3 SusWrite 2.9 11% 9.45 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 19% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.3% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.2% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 5.4 16% 5.47 GB/s	SC Read 4.7 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 5.6 14% 4.87 GB/s	Latency 83.2 48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+AMDBench 36%, 5,372 samples	2x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	1x
Phenom II X4 940AMDBench 49%, 3,675 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6570AMDBench 5%, 19,220 samples	2x
GeForce 7600 GTNvidiaBench 1%, 1,212 samples	1x
GeForce 8400 GSNvidiaBench 1%, 18,254 samples	1x

SSD
KingSpec 512GBBench 64%, 30 samples	1x
870 EVO 1TBSamsungBench 72%, 46 samples	1x
520 Series 120GBIntel $199Bench 74%, 19,348 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16