PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 60.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock 970M Pro3 (all builds) |
Memory | 4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20160617 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 30 '20 at 02:16 |
Run Duration | 119 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 36% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
57.3%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3574 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
60.5%
Good
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 55 55 57 59 MB/s
|
33.4%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
850GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 161 170 171 145 170 MB/s
|
99.2%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT102464BA160B.M16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
|
27.3%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 289x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 228x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 70x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 92x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 51x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 47x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $217 |