Asus X99-A

Performance Results


Gaming 119% UFO	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 128% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus X99-A (all builds)
Memory	54.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190710
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 28 '20 at 15:38
Run Duration	291 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6950X-$499 6,135 User benchmarks, average bench 87% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	91.8% Outstanding	Memory 95.5 1-Core 102 2-Core 241 82% 146 Pts	4-Core 472 8-Core 1,035 87% 753 Pts	64-Core 1,708 106% 1,708 Pts
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85F1) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 442.19 Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	127% Outstanding	Lighting 177 Reflection 195 Parallax 192 144% 188 fps	MRender 123 Gravity 173 Splatting 123 113% 140 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 183GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 751 426 335 370 363 311 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	200% Outstanding	Read 1,796 Write 1,483 Mixed 617 SusWrite 426 240% 1,080 MB/s	4K Read 39.5 4K Write 132 4K Mixed 61.5 209% 77.8 MB/s	DQ Read 934 DQ Write 749 DQ Mixed 728 576% 804 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 200% Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 244GB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 429 424 425 424 425 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 486 Write 469 Mixed 366 SusWrite 427 98% 437 MB/s	4K Read 32.6 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 44.5 163% 61.2 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 348 264% 355 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 395GB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 468 466 468 466 466 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 491 Write 460 Mixed 397 SusWrite 467 102% 454 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 51 170% 61.9 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 355 268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 124%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$132 44,787 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 345GB free Firmware: M3CR010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 425 426 426 425 424 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 486 Write 424 Mixed 344 SusWrite 425 94% 420 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 36.3 137% 54.3 MB/s	DQ Read 367 DQ Write 310 DQ Mixed 271 221% 316 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 125%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 239GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 134 134 134 134 134 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Read 128 Write 129 Mixed 84.7 SusWrite 134 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 234% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 108%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 574GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 76 77 78 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	73.4% Very good	Read 180 Write 54 Mixed 86.3 SusWrite 76.1 73% 99 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1.2 216% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 108%
Lacie d2 Thunderbolt 3 10TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 4TB free Firmware: 1153 SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 182 182 186 185 186 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 77%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 3TB 811 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 61GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 127 126 127 129 129 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	46.7% Average	Read 98.3 Write 93.8 Mixed 27 SusWrite 128 116% 86.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 75% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB 6,447 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	127% Outstanding	MC Read 63.4 MC Write 43.8 MC Mixed 41.7 142% 49.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 21 SC Mixed 23.1 57% 19.9 GB/s	Latency 55.6 72% 55.6 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 136%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 1,978 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	1,228x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	326x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	143x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	170x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	128x
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	109x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	84x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	63x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	47x

RAM
Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GBCrucial $84Bench 97%, 1,914 samples	34x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	32x
16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 2x8GBMicronBench 68%, 1,302 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $763

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16