Asrock Z370M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics84.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive55.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z370M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191031
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 28 '20 at 05:59
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$196
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 94.9
1-Core 118
2-Core 236
87% 149 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 575
68% 514 Pts
64-Core 651
44% 651 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$450
Asus(1043 8673) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Lighting 334
Reflection 277
Parallax 338
88% 316 fps
MRender 292
Gravity 285
Splatting 182
84% 253 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 117%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$33
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 54 41 51 37 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 428
Write 144
Mixed 191
SusWrite 49.2
44% 203 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 69.2
4K Mixed 22.7
102% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 94.7
DQ Mixed 35.4
44% 79 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 69%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$90
143GB free
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 141 138 135 138 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 287
Write 196
Mixed 230
SusWrite 140
48% 213 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 98
4K Mixed 32.5
132% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 160
129% 179 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 82%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$100
16GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 2330
Write 1,676
Mixed 1,529
409% 1,845 MB/s
4K Read 56.4
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 77.5
255% 88.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,333
DQ Write 1,234
DQ Mixed 1,313
977% 1,293 MB/s
Poor: 197% Great: 319%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$50
185GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 58 58 58 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 73.5
Write 70.7
Mixed 48.2
SusWrite 58.4
46% 62.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38%
Great: 67%
WD Elements SE 25FF 4TB
227GB free, PID 25ff
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 41 41 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 42
Write 41
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 40.3
53% 39 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.7
204% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$94
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 26.8
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 26.2
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 57.4
70% 57.4 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 107%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z370M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 2,223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock Z370M-ITX/ac - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $847
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $196Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $345Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $56
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback