Asus P8Z77-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '17 at 15:05
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 213
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 413
55% 413 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Nvidia(10DE 1402) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.19
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Lighting 34.4
Reflection 33.8
Parallax 30.7
28% 33 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 31.3
Splatting 33.1
28% 33.9 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SiImage 100GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0000
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 304
Write 117
Mixed 145
41% 189 MB/s
4K Read 0.14
4K Write 58.6
4K Mixed 15.5
51% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 62
84% 159 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 70%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
2TB free
Firmware: MK7OA840 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 126
90% 126 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 82%
Toshiba MG03ACA100 1TB
461GB free
Firmware: FL2H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 131
Write 130
Mixed 95.2
89% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 2.83
4K Mixed 0.73
168% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 91%
Toshiba MG03ACA100 1TB
420GB free
Firmware: FL2H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 90.6
Write 56.4
Mixed 40.1
46% 62.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.24
4K Mixed 0.45
108% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 91%
Toshiba MG03ACA100 1TB
191GB free
Firmware: FL2H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 131
Write 91.8
Mixed 50.4
67% 91 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 2.11
4K Mixed 0.54
126% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
158GB free
Firmware: CC1H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 94.7
Write 101
Mixed 21.3
52% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.41
96% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
27GB free
Firmware: CC1H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 116
Write 102
Mixed 29.5
60% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.5
115% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 1600 C8 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.7% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 10.2
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 11.7
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-M PRO Builds (Compare 738 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-M PRO - $360

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $650
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback