Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	51.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte B360 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte B360 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190605
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 26 '20 at 19:26
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	68.8% Good	Memory 71 1-Core 111 2-Core 222 74% 135 Pts	4-Core 377 8-Core 427 53% 402 Pts	64-Core 421 26% 421 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 590-$200 122,060 User benchmarks, average bench 57% Gigabyte(1458 2311) CLim: 1560 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.1 Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.3% Above average	Lighting 62 Reflection 74.6 Parallax 78 51% 71.5 fps	MRender 72.5 Gravity 61.6 Splatting 60.8 53% 65 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sobetter Ext 1TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 287GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 305 316 324 322 324 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Read 357 Write 330 Mixed 306 SusWrite 314 74% 327 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 30.1 4K Mixed 16.2 64% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 170 DQ Write 162 DQ Mixed 44.1 66% 125 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 837GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 127 151 159 155 166 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	89% Excellent	Read 164 Write 145 Mixed 61.8 SusWrite 147 94% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 113%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 1GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 2.4 4.1 1.5 0.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	5.82% Terrible	Read 21.5 Write 3.7 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 2.1 9% 8.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.2 36% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.82% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905622-024.A00G 9905622-024.A00G 029E CMV8GX4M1A2400C16 16GB 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	54.3% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 18.9 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 12.4 SC Mixed 13.3 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 99 40% 99 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	79x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	75x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	61x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	125x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	100x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	46x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $711

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16