| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 70.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-E/M.2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160919 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 25 '20 at 05:13 |
| Run Duration | 155 Seconds |
| Run User | THA-User |
| Background CPU | 27% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
58%
Above average
|
62% 109 Pts
|
35% 258 Pts
|
14% 227 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.2%
Poor
|
26% 29.2 fps
|
26% 31.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Apacer AS2280P4 240GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP122PH0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 250 260 229 242 226 MB/s
|
70.8%
Very good
|
83% 371 MB/s
|
91% 28.9 MB/s
|
133% 211 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
277GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 185 190 193 201 193 MB/s
|
109%
Outstanding
|
118% 162 MB/s
|
168% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
54.3%
Above average
|
55% 19.1 GB/s
|
49% 17.2 GB/s
|
40% 98.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-E/M.2 Builds (Compare 1,409 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-E/M.2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 211x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 186x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 167x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 176x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 167x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 108x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $182 |