| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 240% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | EVGA X299 FTW K (all builds) |
| Memory | 16.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20200110 |
| Uptime | 0.9 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 22 '20 at 18:22 |
| Run Duration | 156 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 33% |
PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
76.4%
Very good
|
74% 136 Pts
|
74% 615 Pts
|
114% 1,837 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
Nvidia(10DE 1132) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 442.74
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29%
Poor
|
29% 36.5 fps
|
30% 36.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 878 549 541 535 535 533 MB/s
|
240%
Outstanding
|
363% 1,624 MB/s
|
258% 92.3 MB/s
|
628% 826 MB/s
|
|
Intel Optane+932GBHDD 1TB
438GB free
Firmware: 16.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 256 256 250 156 156 MB/s
|
||||
|
USB DISK Pro 4GB
4GB free, PID 4223
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 2.6 2.4 2.8 2.7 3.4 MB/s
|
3.63%
Terrible
|
5% 5.38 MB/s
|
17% 1.57 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
43.3%
Average
|
44% 15.3 GB/s
|
35% 12.1 GB/s
|
41% 98.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X299 FTW K Builds (Compare 250 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: EVGA X299 FTW K
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples | 29x |
| Core i9-10920XIntel $850Bench 87%, 3,007 samples | 26x |
| Core i9-10980XEIntel $1,100Bench 84%, 4,959 samples | 26x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 22x |
| RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples | 20x |
| RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 20x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $950 |