Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	VIA P4X400-8235 (all builds)
Motherboard	P4X400-8235
Memory	1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20021003
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '17 at 12:52
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	61%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 4 2.66GHz 3 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Socket 478, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	22.7% Poor	Memory 41.1 1-Core 30.4 2-Core 29.1 24% 33.5 Pts	4-Core 26.4 8-Core 29.5 4% 28 Pts	64-Core 30.5 2% 30.5 Pts
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 23%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce FX 5200 Device(0000 0000) 128MB Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 9.6.8.5 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Lighting 0.03 Reflection 0.12 0% 0.07 fps

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3120022A 120GB-$143 933 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 53GB free Firmware: 3.06 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 57 54 161916839 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1938 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2 (07) Seek error rate 86 60 443282401 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 10518 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 90 90 10344 (C2) HDA temperature 34 56 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 57 54 161916839 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 114 407 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	15.4% Very poor	Read 23.6 Write 29.7 Mixed 15.8 17% 23 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.16 4K Mixed 0.3 71% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 31%
WD WD800BB-88JHC0 80GB 2,880 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: 05.01C05 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 159 158 3008 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5562 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 11155 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5388 (C2) HDA temperature 100 67 43 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 197 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	15.3% Very poor	Read 25.4 Write 27.5 Mixed 18.8 18% 23.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.19 4K Mixed 0.35 84% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 3 slots used 2GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	7.41% Terrible	MC Read 2.3 MC Write 2.3 MC Mixed 1.8 6% 2.13 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 1.7 6% 2.27 GB/s	Latency 197 20% 197 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.41% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

VIA P4X400-8235

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)