Performance Results


Gaming 75% Battleship	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 76% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	75.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	127% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180824
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 12 '20 at 20:14
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$412 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	97.3% Outstanding	Memory 89.1 1-Core 150 2-Core 289 96% 176 Pts	4-Core 566 8-Core 1,009 95% 787 Pts	64-Core 1,584 98% 1,584 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% EVGA(3842 4995) CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	75.2% Very good	Lighting 96.9 Reflection 103 Parallax 96.3 79% 98.8 fps	MRender 88.5 Gravity 89.2 Splatting 74.3 68% 84 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB 11,317 User benchmarks, average bench 264% 454GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 536 738 743 496 496 489 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	139% Outstanding	Read 988 Write 570 Mixed 585 SusWrite 583 152% 681 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 86.9 4K Mixed 41.5 146% 53.2 MB/s	DQ Read 247 DQ Write 600 DQ Mixed 335 281% 394 MB/s
Poor: 120% ↑ This bench: 139% Great: 445%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 512GB 18,578 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 358GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 535 737 715 309 291 307 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	128% Outstanding	Read 1,016 Write 890 Mixed 563 SusWrite 482 165% 738 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 84.6 4K Mixed 36.7 136% 50.1 MB/s	DQ Read 166 DQ Write 585 DQ Mixed 281 242% 344 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 332%
Kxg5aznv512g TOSHIBA 512GB 1,094 User benchmarks, average bench 136% 188GB free (System drive) Firmware: AAHA5102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 341 341 317 324 322 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	127% Outstanding	Read 631 Write 452 Mixed 526 SusWrite 338 109% 487 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 45.2 168% 65.2 MB/s	DQ Read 806 DQ Write 499 DQ Mixed 261 300% 522 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 200%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMU16GX4M2A2666C16 4x8GB 863 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	65.5% Good	MC Read 21.8 MC Write 25.2 MC Mixed 20 64% 22.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 27.7 SC Mixed 23.2 65% 22.7 GB/s	Latency 68.4 58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 98%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	856x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	564x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	487x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	288x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	278x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	253x

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $1,388

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16