Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3455 3,455 User benchmarks, average bench 29% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	33% Below average	Memory 42.2 1-Core 44.3 2-Core 87.1 34% 57.9 Pts	4-Core 139 8-Core 140 19% 139 Pts	64-Core 143 9% 143 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.77% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 1.85 Parallax 1.75 1% 1.77 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 4.04 2% 2.95 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.77% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
USB 3.0 LucidPort USB300 2TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1.5TB free, PID 5000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 101 101 100 100 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	46.8% Average	Read 124 Write 116 Mixed 64.5 SusWrite 100 133% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 105% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x1.5GB 419 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 2 of 2 slots used 3GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 10.2 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.67 GB/s	Latency 192 21% 192 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	485x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	478x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	457x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1,363x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	486x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	354x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16