Medionpc MS-7707

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedionpc MS-7707  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDIONPC MS-7707
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110215
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMar 06 '20 at 17:30
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2300
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 20,055,412 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 77.2
2-Core 152
65% 106 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 277
37% 275 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.4% Below average
Lighting 40.2
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 37.7
33% 36.6 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 40
Splatting 37.7
32% 38.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
638GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 352 419 423 422 427 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 396
Mixed 396
SusWrite 385
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 49.6
4K Mixed 34.6
112% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 296
239% 338 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 125%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
542GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 137 138 136 138 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 139
Write 134
Mixed 91.1
SusWrite 136
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 100%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170
705GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 74 74 75 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
24% Poor
Read 9
Write 70.5
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 74.4
30% 41.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 24%
Great: 63%
Seagate Expansion+ 4TB
714GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 18 18 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 27.5
Write 20.6
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 18
16% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.5
151% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 68%
Seagate Expansion Desk 6TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7.2 7 7.2 6.9 7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 29.8
Write 24.3
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 7
16% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.8
263% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 89%
Seagate Expansion+ Desk 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7.1 7.2 7.2 7.1 7.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 27.4
Write 23.1
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 7.1
16% 20.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.8
215% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 97%
Seagate Expansion+ Desk 4TB
916GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7.2 7.2 7.1 7.2 7.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 27.7
Write 22.9
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 7.1
14% 19.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.5
165% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 97%
WD Elements SE 25FF 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 25ff
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 31.1
Write 22.5
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 16.2
30% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 62%
WD Elements SE 25FF 4TB
853GB free, PID 25ff
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 6.9 6.8 6.8 6.8 7.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 24.4
Write 21.7
Mixed 22
SusWrite 6.9
24% 18.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
144% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 62%
WD Elements 2TB
472GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 6 6.7 6.5 6.2 6.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 29.1
Write 20.3
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 6.4
24% 19.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
46.1% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 14.3
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 13.8
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7707 Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Medionpc MS-7707

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback