Asrock Q1900-ITX

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Q1900-ITX (all builds)
Memory	0.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20141031
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 24 '20 at 19:23
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J1900 6,116 User benchmarks, average bench 34% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	40.6% Average	Memory 67 1-Core 22.8 2-Core 45.2 33% 45 Pts	4-Core 85.3 8-Core 84.8 11% 85.1 Pts	64-Core 86.9 5% 86.9 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Atom Processor E3800 Series/Celeron Processor N2920/J1900 300 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 0F31) 1.5GB Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 36.15.0.1064 Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	0.85% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.15 Parallax 1 1% 1.02 fps	MRender 1.81 Gravity 0.73 Splatting 1.39 1% 1.31 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.85% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 55 55 55 50 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	Read 299 Write 103 Mixed 119 SusWrite 57.2 32% 145 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 13 4K Mixed 17 53% 15.4 MB/s	DQ Read 43.7 DQ Write 26.4 DQ Mixed 35.7 26% 35.3 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 73%
Samsung HM641JI 640GB-$50 10,598 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 197GB free Firmware: 2AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 73 75 75 74 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 76.3 Write 17.5 Mixed 49 SusWrite 74.4 40% 54.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 87% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
RAMAXEL RMT3170ME68F9F1600 1x4GB 6,848 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.5% Very poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 5.6 19% 6.5 GB/s	SC Read 0.3 SC Write 0.5 SC Mixed 0.1 1% 0.3 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q1900-ITX Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock Q1900-ITX

CPU
Celeron J1900IntelBench 34%, 6,116 samples	43x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	43x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	5x
850 Evo 120GBSamsung $80Bench 96%, 69,224 samples	4x
Solid State Disk 60GBSpccBench 52%, 2,308 samples	3x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,608 samples	5x
CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GBCrucialBench 38%, 4,853 samples	4x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 30,280 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $38

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16