Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	36% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4300-$73 55,454 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	62.4% Good	Memory 89.3 1-Core 47.2 2-Core 124 54% 86.9 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 207 28% 208 Pts	64-Core 211 13% 211 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Device(7377 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	36% Below average	Lighting 46.6 Reflection 32 Parallax 39 38% 39.2 fps	MRender 38 Gravity 42.6 Splatting 37.7 32% 39.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 104 51 42 62 66 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.4% Below average	Read 217 Write 172 Mixed 159 SusWrite 79.9 35% 157 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 10.2 4K Mixed 13.1 47% 13.3 MB/s	DQ Read 88.7 DQ Write 60.1 DQ Mixed 41.2 40% 63.3 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 53%
Seagate ST3160215AS 160GB-$32 6,007 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 56GB free Firmware: 4.AAB SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 56 56 56 56 56 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	33.5% Below average	Read 60.6 Write 11.1 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 55.8 29% 38.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 41%
Seagate ST380817AS 80GB-$130 2,079 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 13GB free Firmware: 3.42 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 45 46 45 46 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	26.8% Poor	Read 47.3 Write 12 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 45.7 25% 33.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB 2,092 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM 800 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.8% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 15.7 42% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 12.5 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 68.1 59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	1x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	1x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	1x

SSD
NEO N400 SSD 120GBKlevvBench 65%, 486 samples	2x
2+0 Stripe/RAID0 498GBAMDBench 123%, 301 samples	1x
XPG SX930 240GBAdata $80Bench 87%, 1,536 samples	1x

RAM
F3-14900CL9-4GBSR0 F3-14900CL9-4GBSR0 8GBUnknownBench 39%, 195 samples	2x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	1x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	1x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $110

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16