Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	272% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181104
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 24 '20 at 14:10
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	75% Very good	Memory 73.7 1-Core 112 2-Core 218 75% 135 Pts	4-Core 411 8-Core 675 66% 543 Pts	64-Core 865 54% 865 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.66% Terrible	Lighting 4.27 Reflection 4.54 Parallax 3.75 4% 4.19 fps	MRender 4.14 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.13 4% 4.72 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.66% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 428GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2178 866 821 816 822 828 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	272% Outstanding	Read 2,525 Write 2,235 Mixed 1,802 SusWrite 1,055 426% 1,904 MB/s	4K Read 60.9 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 76.8 249% 82.3 MB/s	DQ Read 861 DQ Write 452 DQ Mixed 670 494% 661 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 272% Great: 355%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$46 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 458GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 461 460 463 462 424 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 503 Write 465 Mixed 434 SusWrite 454 104% 464 MB/s	4K Read 38.2 4K Write 81.7 4K Mixed 48.2 163% 56 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 356 DQ Mixed 290 239% 343 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 125%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90 11,249 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 278GB free Firmware: 04.04V05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 123 121 123 123 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	69.4% Good	Read 120 Write 120 Mixed 71.4 SusWrite 122 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD1 CT8G4DFS824A.M8FE 16GB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	87.8% Excellent	MC Read 34.5 MC Write 33.2 MC Mixed 28.3 92% 32 GB/s	SC Read 21.5 SC Write 32.3 SC Mixed 25 75% 26.3 GB/s	Latency 93.2 43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,050 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	1,463x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	1,307x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	1,006x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	949x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	735x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	654x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	716x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	340x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $54Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	284x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	293x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	226x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	204x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $357

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16