Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	41.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180314
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '20 at 13:51
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190 195,006 User benchmarks, average bench 76% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	87.4% Excellent	Memory 93 1-Core 145 2-Core 290 97% 176 Pts	4-Core 466 8-Core 511 64% 488 Pts	64-Core 533 33% 533 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 87.4% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329 50,279 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Asus(1043 8469) 3GB CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.2% Average	Lighting 49.7 Reflection 44 Parallax 59.7 40% 51.1 fps	MRender 60.2 Gravity 57.2 Splatting 42.3 42% 53.3 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016) 20,831 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3311000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 67 129 95 108 128 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Read 492 Write 102 Mixed 381 SusWrite 110 60% 271 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 81.3 4K Mixed 21.1 102% 41.2 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 160 DQ Mixed 33.8 63% 125 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 70%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB 64,984 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 372GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 195 195 194 196 192 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 187 Write 185 Mixed 72.5 SusWrite 194 116% 160 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 678GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 183 183 185 185 185 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 182 Write 185 Mixed 80.5 SusWrite 184 115% 158 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905678-042.A00G 2x8GB 382 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	77.3% Very good	MC Read 28.4 MC Write 29.3 MC Mixed 23.7 78% 27.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.9 SC Write 28.9 SC Mixed 24.4 68% 23.7 GB/s	Latency 62.2 64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 88%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	267x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	266x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	196x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	355x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	288x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	138x

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $1,224

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16