Asrock H170 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H170 Performance  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '16 at 21:23
Run Duration291 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 106
2-Core 210
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 338
40% 307 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Palit(1569 1380) 2GB
CLim: 1359 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 20.8
18% 20 fps
MRender 25.6
Gravity 23.1
Splatting 17.3
18% 22 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR031 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 483
Write 340
Mixed 337
86% 387 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 31.4
4K Mixed 18.1
70% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 92.3
DQ Mixed 9
34% 75.9 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 137
Write 118
Mixed 125
96% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 2.07
4K Mixed 0.28
104% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 84%
Seagate ST3500320NS 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: NA01 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 106
Write 104
Mixed 97.4
77% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.38
102% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 61%
Mass Storage Device 64GB
58GB free, PID 125d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
5.8% Terrible
Read 19.3
Write 5.22
Mixed 8.79
12% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.95
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.49
42% 1.58 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.8%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
73.2% Very good
MC Read 25
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 24
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 23.5
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170 Performance Builds (Compare 199 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock H170 Performance

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $436
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback