Asrock Z170M Pro4S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive84% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z170M Pro4S  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '20 at 13:56
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 93.5
1-Core 134
2-Core 264
92% 164 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 514
67% 502 Pts
64-Core 520
32% 520 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 89%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3512GJ 512GB
453GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 249 98 101 97 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 442
Write 394
Mixed 330
SusWrite 170
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 89.8
4K Mixed 34.8
139% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 218
190% 278 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 84%
Great: 84%
SanDisk SSD U100 8GB
1GB free, PID 70f1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 40.7
Write 31
Mixed 21.2
37% 31 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 5.4
394% 6.3 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4-3000 CL16 4GB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
75.8% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 22
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 23.5
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170M Pro4S Builds (Compare 325 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z170M Pro4S - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $467
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback