PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A97 R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 14.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20140407 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 18 '20 at 07:35 |
Run Duration | 153 Seconds |
Run User | FIN-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
66.7%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 8569) 2GB
CLim: 1593 MHz, MLim: 1902 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.49
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Toshiba MK1652GSX 160GB-$30
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LV01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 46 46 46 44 MB/s
|
29%
Poor
|
|||
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
603GB free
Firmware: JP4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 136 135 137 137 137 MB/s
|
77.2%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 862x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 640x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 436x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 185x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 158x |
RX 480AMD $75Bench 46%, 261,163 samples | 118x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $358 |