Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190912
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '20 at 00:50
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	31%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$515 50,170 User benchmarks, average bench 89% AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	90.6% Outstanding	Memory 80.2 1-Core 135 2-Core 269 88% 161 Pts	4-Core 541 8-Core 968 91% 754 Pts	64-Core 2,491 154% 2,491 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 90.6% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3701) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 71% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 270GB free Firmware: DXT06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 44 42 45 40 43 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	Read 301 Write 121 Mixed 122 SusWrite 47.2 32% 148 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 57.4 4K Mixed 18 94% 34.1 MB/s	DQ Read 354 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 54.6 88% 175 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 85%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 104GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,438 Write 2,301 Mixed 1,657 474% 2,132 MB/s	4K Read 61.6 4K Write 152 4K Mixed 83.4 281% 99.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,195 DQ Write 1,047 DQ Mixed 1,138 848% 1,127 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 110GB free Firmware: CC29 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 119 114 84 121 117 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Read 115 Write 73.2 Mixed 20 SusWrite 115 58% 80.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 113%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125 12,743 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 726GB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 87 76 79 105 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Read 155 Write 148 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 91.3 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.2 266% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 109%
128 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 4100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 3.9 3.7 4 4.6 4.7 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	5% Terrible	Read 20.5 Write 17 Mixed 16.2 SusWrite 4 18% 14.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 22% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 5% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMWX16GC3200C16W2E 1x16GB 315 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 16.9 52% 18 GB/s	SC Read 18.4 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 19.1 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 80.1 50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)