Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive92.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190717
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJan 17 '20 at 04:35
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$295
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Memory 93.9
1-Core 137
2-Core 266
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 890
83% 693 Pts
64-Core 896
56% 896 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 154
Reflection 149
Parallax 148
126% 150 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 133
Splatting 108
112% 142 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 117%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 245 262 262 261 262 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 260
Mixed 293
SusWrite 250
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 40.3
150% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 194
161% 230 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 123%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
171GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 295 78 83 82 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 489
Mixed 419
SusWrite 155
88% 394 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 52.8
190% 71.8 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 348
262% 350 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 104%
Great: 121%
Team T253TD001T 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: Q0410A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 374 454 427 425 426 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 456
Mixed 412
SusWrite 401
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 59.5
201% 73 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 123
155% 277 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 124%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 23.8
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 25.6
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 60
67% 60 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 810 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $260
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback