Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory224GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 224GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S7  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2939-A1
Memory218.5 GB free of 224 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180219
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '20 at 17:22
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 73.5
1-Core 65
2-Core 134
54% 91 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 520
49% 409 Pts
64-Core 1,132
70% 1,132 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Lighting 39.2
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 36.7
32% 35.2 fps
MRender 36.8
Gravity 37
Splatting 35.5
30% 36.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE5000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 52 56 68 74 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 420
Write 240
Mixed 284
SusWrite 85.6
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 24.5
4K Mixed 10.1
54% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 80.3
DQ Mixed 41.7
46% 78.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 55%
Intenso Sata III 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 413 406 402 415 415 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 468
Write 405
Mixed 387
SusWrite 410
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 66.9
4K Mixed 23.9
101% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 41.3
87% 172 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 91%
LSI MegaRAID SAS RMB 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.40
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.2% Excellent
Read 262
Write 16.7
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 17.8
60% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4C Samsung M393B2G70BH0- HMT31GR7BFR4C HMT31GR7BFR4C Samsung M393B1K70CH0- HMT31GR7BFR4C HMT31GR7BFR4C Samsung M393B2G70BH0- Se... 224GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 16384, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 16384, 8192, 8192, 16384, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.9% Good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 23.5
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.6
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback