Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160 46,742 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Memory 20.7 1-Core 35.6 2-Core 54.1 21% 36.8 Pts	4-Core 99.5 8-Core 63.7 12% 81.6 Pts	64-Core 59.6 4% 59.6 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 21DA) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.64% Terrible	Lighting 1.83 Reflection 1.31 Parallax 1.19 2% 1.44 fps	MRender 2.57 Gravity 0.97 Splatting 3.17 2% 2.24 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.64% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196 15,660 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFZ12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 44 33 5.5 54 208 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Read 389 Write 292 Mixed 45.3 SusWrite 92.1 45% 205 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 20.5 4K Mixed 23.2 42% 14.9 MB/s	DQ Read 238 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 147 125% 184 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-046.A00LF 99U5428-068.A00LF 12GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24.2% Poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 10.2 25% 8.9 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 7.5 19% 6.63 GB/s	Latency 316 13% 316 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 36%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16