Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	19.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon LE-1620 143 User benchmarks, average bench 35% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	23% Poor	Memory 39.5 1-Core 34.7 2-Core 39.5 26% 37.9 Pts	4-Core 39.2 8-Core 39.9 5% 39.6 Pts	64-Core 40.4 2% 40.4 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 43%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Biostar S100-240GB 240GB 879 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 154GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 54 2.7 6.1 57 66 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.5% Very poor	Read 58 Write 88.3 Mixed 88.3 SusWrite 46.7 16% 70.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 27.2 4K Mixed 15.6 37% 14.8 MB/s	DQ Read 30.8 DQ Write 61.9 DQ Mixed 29.5 27% 40.7 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 266, 266 MHz 1024, 2048 MB Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	10.4% Very poor	MC Read 3.6 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 2.7 9% 3.27 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 1.3 10% 3.4 GB/s	Latency 204 20% 204 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Phenom FX-5000 Quad-CoreAMDBench 47%, 98 samples	2x
Phenom II X4 960TAMD $469Bench 54%, 4,461 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 21,442 samples	1x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	1x
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples	1x

SSD
SATA SSD 120GBZotacBench 78%, 316 samples	2x

RAM
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16