Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	4.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD PRO A4-8350B R5, 6 Compute Cores 2C+4G 207 User benchmarks, average bench 35% P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	20.9% Poor	Memory 25.7 1-Core 66.5 2-Core 51.9 30% 48 Pts	4-Core 93.4 8-Core 94.9 12% 94.2 Pts	64-Core 103 6% 103 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 340 566 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Dell(1028 0083) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	4.92% Terrible	Lighting 6.23 Reflection 4.81 Parallax 10.8 5% 7.29 fps	MRender 4.38 Gravity 8.9 Splatting 4.13 5% 5.8 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.92% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba HDWD105 500GB-$49 9,420 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 217GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS1O SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 29 75 104 115 118 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	28.3% Poor	Read 17.9 Write 75.4 Mixed 9.6 SusWrite 80.4 33% 45.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.3 67% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX RMR1870EF48E8W1333 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G 12GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1333, 1600, 1333, 1866 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	23.3% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 9.6 24% 8.43 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 8.5 19% 6.77 GB/s	Latency 281 14% 281 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
PRO A4-8350B R5, 6 Compute Cores 2C+4GAMDBench 35%, 207 samples	1x

GPU
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	1x

RAM
99P5584-028.A00LF 99P5584-028.A00LF Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 16GBKingstonBench 24%, 1 sample	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16