Lenovo 10DS0006MX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10DS0006MX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150804
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 07 '20 at 21:12
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 85.3
1-Core 117
2-Core 233
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 574
62% 490 Pts
64-Core 555
34% 555 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.72% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 4.35
Parallax 4.19
4% 4.31 fps
MRender 4.14
Gravity 3.87
Splatting 6.04
4% 4.68 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.72%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-00000 256GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 293 289 295 295 294 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 443
Write 299
Mixed 239
SusWrite 292
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 27
123% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 246
209% 307 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
59.5% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 19.1
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 19.2
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback