Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	17.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium J4205 1,095 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	24.5% Poor	Memory 29.2 1-Core 43.1 2-Core 71.7 28% 48 Pts	4-Core 112 8-Core 132 16% 122 Pts	64-Core 140 9% 140 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 7,629 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4974 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	2.06% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 2.15 Parallax 2.16 2% 2.1 fps	MRender 2.81 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 4.91 3% 3.34 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.06% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
ZRW 128G 128GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0831B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 177 21 21 29 25 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	17.2% Very poor	Read 212 Write 187 Mixed 169 SusWrite 63.1 35% 158 MB/s	4K Read 9.2 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 0.7 18% 5.2 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	20.9% Poor	MC Read 6.1 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 6.6 23% 8.13 GB/s	SC Read 1.8 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 3.2 9% 3.03 GB/s	Latency 259 15% 259 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium J4205IntelBench 33%, 1,095 samples	13x
Pentium J4205IntelBench 35%, 25 samples	4x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 7,629 samples	12x
HD Graphics 505IntelBench 2%, 2,850 samples	5x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16