Packard 00000000000000000000000

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 11 years old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPackard 00000000000000000000000  (all builds)
MotherboardNEC MS-7168
Memory0.8 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060123
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 25 '19 at 20:46
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
44.8% Average
Memory 80.1
1-Core 35.4
2-Core 50.6
41% 55.4 Pts
4-Core 59
8-Core 62.9
8% 61 Pts
64-Core 68
5% 68 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon X1300
Sapphire(174B 0470) 64MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.593.100.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
0.01% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 1.3
0% 1.27 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.01%
Great: 0%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$40
307GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 31 45 46 58 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 61.7
Write 50.8
Mixed 40
SusWrite 46.5
37% 49.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
512, 512, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
11.6% Very poor
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 2.5
8% 2.9 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 2.6
8% 2.83 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $192Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $153Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $328Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $47
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback