Lenovo 80EC

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Lenovo 80EC (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO Lancer 5B3
Memory	3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín, 1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180118
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 25 '19 at 15:19
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	59%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-7500 APU (2014 M.Ka) 4,105 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	27.9% Poor	Memory 41.9 1-Core 29.2 2-Core 54.2 27% 41.8 Pts	4-Core 82.5 8-Core 79.5 11% 81 Pts	64-Core 83.5 5% 83.5 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 3,765 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Legend(17AA 3830) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.1001 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.67% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 6 Parallax 5.47 3% 5.22 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 3.63 Splatting 6.17 4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.67% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$22 61,417 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 172GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900612 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 45 49 46 54 51 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.1% Very poor	Read 97.5 Write 86.5 Mixed 75 SusWrite 48 17% 76.8 MB/s	4K Read 10.2 4K Write 16.1 4K Mixed 9.7 36% 12 MB/s	DQ Read 20.2 DQ Write 31.1 DQ Mixed 16.2 15% 22.5 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 91%
DMI External 60GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 51GB free, PID b136 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 26 27 27 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.7% Very poor	Read 28.2 Write 27.9 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 26.4 35% 25.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.4 46% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 RMT3170ME68F9F1600 8GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 667, 800 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	22.4% Poor	MC Read 9 MC Write 5.6 MC Mixed 10 23% 8.2 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 6.5 15% 5.1 GB/s	Latency 194 21% 194 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 80EC Builds (Compare 232 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 36%

Jet ski

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80EC

CPU
FX-7500 APU (2014 M.Ka)AMDBench 33%, 4,105 samples	132x
A10-7300 APU (2014 M.Ka)AMDBench 31%, 6,248 samples	90x
A8-7100 APU (2014 M.Ka)AMDBench 32%, 1,069 samples	10x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 3,765 samples	130x
Radeon R6 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 5,093 samples	90x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 1,187 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
Solid State Disk 128GBSpccBench 69%, 14,793 samples	6x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x

RAM
RMT3170MN68F9F1600 2x4GBRAMAXELBench 42%, 3,176 samples	60x
RMT3170ME68F9F1600 2x4GBRamaxelBench 47%, 5,452 samples	22x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 26,681 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16