Gigabyte GA-AX370M-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte AX370M-Gaming 3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370M-Gaming 3-CF (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180131
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Dec 25 '19 at 10:45
Run Duration	220 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185 123,820 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Memory 79.6 1-Core 120 2-Core 222 79% 141 Pts	4-Core 439 8-Core 846 76% 643 Pts	64-Core 1,126 70% 1,126 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90 64,240 User benchmarks, average bench 20% MSI(1462 809D) CLim: 1210 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.12.2 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	21.2% Poor	Lighting 23.9 Reflection 31.2 Parallax 28.7 20% 27.9 fps	MRender 30.5 Gravity 24 Splatting 33.7 24% 29.4 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso SATA III SSD 120GB 1,366 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 76 71 76 92 91 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	71.6% Very good	Read 494 Write 441 Mixed 366 SusWrite 110 79% 353 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 49.7 4K Mixed 29.6 102% 34.8 MB/s	DQ Read 310 DQ Write 296 DQ Mixed 171 165% 259 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 88%
Intenso Sata III 120GB 964 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 46GB free Firmware: P0510E SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 53 52 52 54 52 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	66.8% Good	Read 484 Write 341 Mixed 352 SusWrite 72.2 70% 312 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 31.5 4K Mixed 34.2 98% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 260 DQ Write 263 DQ Mixed 91.1 115% 204 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 90%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 174GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 123 124 124 123 125 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	59.8% Above average	Read 83 Write 35 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 125 56% 75.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1 204% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 75%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 58GB free Firmware: 1AJ100E4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 110 107 105 110 108 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	49.5% Average	Read 64.3 Write 33.5 Mixed 69.5 SusWrite 108 51% 68.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.1 194% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 75%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 142GB free Firmware: 1AJ100E5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 81 81 82 81 82 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	44.3% Average	Read 72 Write 34.5 Mixed 66 SusWrite 81.9 47% 63.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.1 194% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 75%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 1TB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 38GB free, PID 1068 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 38 37 37 37 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 28.5 Write 26.3 Mixed 16.5 SusWrite 37.2 37% 27.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 45%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 3,454 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 23GB free, PID a00d Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 63 63 63 64 67 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	36.5% Below average	Read 116 Write 115 Mixed 38 SusWrite 64.5 106% 83.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 44%
TOSHIBA MK5075GSX 500GB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 36GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 35 38 38 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Read 27 Write 32.5 Mixed 16.5 SusWrite 37.3 39% 28.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.2 22% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2666 C19 2x8GB 7,702 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	93.2% Outstanding	MC Read 37.7 MC Write 34.4 MC Mixed 29.1 96% 33.7 GB/s	SC Read 23 SC Write 35.6 SC Mixed 26.3 81% 28.3 GB/s	Latency 81.3 49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370M-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370M-Gaming 3-CF

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	37x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	24x
Ryzen 5 2400GAMD $135Bench 63%, 127,344 samples	15x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	13x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	13x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	13x

SSD
A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GBKingston $53Bench 108%, 30,265 samples	7x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 87,241 samples	8x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $345

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16