Toshiba PORTEGE R600

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 14% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

CPU throttled at 70% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Toshiba PORTEGE R600 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	1.5 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100921
Uptime	2.8 Days
Run Date	Dec 24 '19 at 05:32
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	0%
CPU Throttled	70%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo U9400 547 User benchmarks, average bench 32% IC1050, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	20.9% Poor	Memory 38.3 1-Core 11.5 2-Core 22.6 18% 24.1 Pts	4-Core 22.7 8-Core 22.3 3% 22.5 Pts	64-Core 22.7 1% 22.7 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Toshiba(1179 000C) 1.2GB Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1883 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.25% Terrible	Lighting 0.33 Reflection 0.19 Parallax 0.34 0% 0.29 fps	MRender 0.19 Gravity 0.17 Splatting 0.39 0% 0.25 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.25% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS723232L9A360 320GB 1,522 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: FC4OC30F SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 61 60 58 60 62 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	31% Below average	Read 48.5 Write 49.5 Mixed 31.8 SusWrite 59.5 35% 47.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 45%
Lexar JD FireFly 4GB 135 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID a761 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 16.2 Write 2.7 Mixed 4.3 7% 7.73 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 1024, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	7.58% Terrible	MC Read 2.9 MC Write 2 MC Mixed 2 7% 2.3 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 1.8 SC Mixed 2 6% 2.03 GB/s	Latency 210 19% 210 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.58% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PORTEGE R600 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 24%

Surfboard

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba PORTEGE R600

CPU
Core2 Duo U9400IntelBench 32%, 547 samples	1x

GPU
Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples	1x

SSD
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x

RAM
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 13% - Very poor

Total price: $95

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16