Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3840QM-$549 3,981 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Memory 81.6 1-Core 104 2-Core 204 74% 130 Pts	4-Core 369 8-Core 502 55% 435 Pts	64-Core 493 30% 493 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Dell(1028 053E) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	4.33% Terrible	Lighting 4.73 Reflection 6.42 Parallax 3.25 4% 4.8 fps	MRender 6.57 Gravity 2.63 Splatting 9 5% 6.07 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.33% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB 58,990 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 415GB free (System drive) Firmware: UG2204RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 131 142 223 182 211 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	46.7% Average	Read 412 Write 359 Mixed 274 SusWrite 183 69% 307 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 24.1 4K Mixed 8.8 49% 16.5 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 95.2 DQ Mixed 12.7 35% 75 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston X7C75G-HYC Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB X7C75G-HYC Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.4% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 13.7 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 16.6 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 77.6 52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	176x
Quadro K2000MNvidiaBench 6%, 4,288 samples	137x
Quadro K1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 4,204 samples	86x

SSD
PM830 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 63%, 9,379 samples	30x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x

RAM
X7C75G-HYC 4x4GBKingstonBench 60%, 524 samples	32x
M471B1G73BH0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 51%, 1,654 samples	15x
X7C75G-HYC 2x4GBKingstonBench 58%, 334 samples	11x

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $220

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16