| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Huananzhi X79 (all builds) |
| Memory | 26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20180707 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 21 '19 at 18:20 |
| Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
| Run User | UKR-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
|
53.7%
Above average
|
50% 89.5 Pts
|
51% 432 Pts
|
90% 1,455 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.76
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
52.8%
Above average
|
48% 62 fps
|
62% 75.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 175 180 163 202 172 MB/s
|
34.1%
Below average
|
31% 141 MB/s
|
47% 15.1 MB/s
|
13% 19.9 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
800GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 155 154 155 155 156 MB/s
|
89%
Excellent
|
99% 135 MB/s
|
208% 1.53 MB/s
| |
|
|
58.6%
Above average
|
77% 104 MB/s
|
218% 1.67 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393B2G70BH0- 2x16GB
2 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
48.4%
Average
|
55% 19.4 GB/s
|
16% 5.63 GB/s
|
27% 147 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X79 Builds (Compare 670 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Huananzhi X79
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples | 122x |
| Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples | 71x |
| Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples | 67x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 44x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 42x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 39x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $158 |