HP PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	54.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI IONA
Memory	1.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100625
Uptime	9.4 Days
Run Date	Dec 20 '19 at 23:01
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	ARE-User
Background CPU	22%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	61.3% Good	Memory 87.7 1-Core 69.1 2-Core 125 59% 94 Pts	4-Core 202 8-Core 214 28% 208 Pts	64-Core 282 17% 282 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3283) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	54.7% Above average	Lighting 67.8 Reflection 69.8 Parallax 66 55% 67.9 fps	MRender 65.1 Gravity 65.3 Splatting 65.6 54% 65.4 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD256HAFV-000H7 256GB 3,736 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM05H6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 33 36 39 38 47 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.7% Below average	Read 134 Write 106 Mixed 150 SusWrite 44.6 24% 109 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 38.4 4K Mixed 20.4 70% 24.7 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 93.3 86% 136 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 205GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 94 94 97 107 107 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	59% Above average	Read 108 Write 113 Mixed 65.5 SusWrite 98.2 71% 96.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 9DECBMZB-TATP 9801 9905471-017.A00LF 6GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	20.3% Poor	MC Read 6.5 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 5.9 18% 6.23 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 3.6 12% 4.1 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM Builds (Compare 241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: HP PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	49x
Core i3 550Intel $110Bench 47%, 19,058 samples	41x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	39x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	29x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	15x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	14x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	6x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x

RAM
M378B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GBCE80CE80Bench 39%, 417 samples	7x
HMT351U6EFR8C-PB HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 8GBAD80AD80Bench 42%, 11 samples	7x
M378B5673FH0-CH9 4x2GBCE80CE80Bench 38%, 285 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16