| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 21.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
| System | Dell Precision WorkStation T3500 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Dell 0XPDFK |
| Memory | 5.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20100412 |
| Uptime | 0.8 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 17 '19 at 11:56 |
| Run Duration | 110 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
62.7%
Good
|
59% 95.2 Pts
|
29% 217 Pts
|
14% 233 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
21.1%
Poor
|
22% 24 fps
|
20% 24.5 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD VelociRaptor 250GB-$35
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.06A00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 69 18 39 131 70 MB/s
|
56.7%
Above average
|
76% 103 MB/s
|
298% 2.37 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42%
Average
|
42% 14.8 GB/s
|
26% 9.27 GB/s
|
57% 69.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Precision WorkStation T3500 Builds (Compare 3,399 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Dell Precision WorkStation T3500
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon W3530Intel $290Bench 65%, 5,773 samples | 477x |
| Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples | 330x |
| Xeon X5670IntelBench 73%, 9,061 samples | 243x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 172x |
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 155x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 126x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 69% - Good | Total price: $377 |