Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 15 '19 at 01:26
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 189
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 386
45% 351 Pts
64-Core 470
29% 470 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
Nvidia(10DE 1051) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.6% Average
Lighting 57.2
Reflection 57.1
Parallax 70.9
47% 61.7 fps
MRender 68.6
Gravity 63.6
Splatting 44.3
47% 58.8 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 284 279 279 278 276 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 455
Write 285
Mixed 260
SusWrite 280
71% 320 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 68
4K Mixed 22.5
90% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 210
180% 264 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 128%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
5GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 454
Write 432
Mixed 386
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 73.2
4K Mixed 41.8
143% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 360
272% 365 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Verbatim STORE N GO 16GB
15GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
4.92% Terrible
Read 19
Write 8
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 7
12% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.92%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.1% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 14.5
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 13.3
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V FORMULA Builds (Compare 710 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $722
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback