Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Alienware Aurora-R2 (all builds)
Motherboard	Alienware 0RV30W
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100628
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Dec 14 '19 at 20:32
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Memory 96.5 1-Core 83.8 2-Core 159 69% 113 Pts	4-Core 282 8-Core 366 41% 324 Pts	64-Core 364 22% 364 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3746) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.54 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	Lighting 39 Reflection 30.2 Parallax 36.7 32% 35.3 fps	MRender 36.5 Gravity 37.2 Splatting 35.6 30% 36.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB 24,911 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF3600RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 64 71 60 57 83 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26% Poor	Read 216 Write 147 Mixed 140 SusWrite 65.2 32% 142 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 16.7 4K Mixed 7.3 37% 12.1 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 1 DQ Mixed 23.8 26% 46.6 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 56%
Crucial M4 64GB-$92 7,336 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 21GB free Firmware: 010G SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 71 64 68 61 57 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.5% Below average	Read 234 Write 106 Mixed 138 SusWrite 64.2 30% 136 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 51.1 4K Mixed 10.6 63% 25.5 MB/s	DQ Read 129 DQ Write 83.6 DQ Mixed 28.5 42% 80.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 65%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 228GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 90 92 92 92 93 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	Read 95.3 Write 90.5 Mixed 65.3 SusWrite 91.1 63% 85.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 202% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL8-4GBXM0 F3-12800CL9-4GBZL0 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 16GB 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.9% Average	MC Read 18 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 14.5 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 12.8 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 52.4 76% 52.4 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

SSD
Solid State Disk 1TBSpccBench 79%, 17,192 samples	5x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	4x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	3x

RAM
M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5273CH0-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 8GBSamsungBench 38%, 12 samples	3x
M378B5273CH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5273CH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 12GBSamsungBench 46%, 31 samples	3x
CT51264BD160BJ.M8F Reboto DDR3 4gb CT51264BD160BJ.C8F Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 16GBUnknownBench 22%, 8 samples	3x

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $398

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16