Asrock J4105B-ITX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive43.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock J4105B-ITX  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '19 at 13:44
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Celeron J4105
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
43.7% Average
Memory 48.4
1-Core 57.8
2-Core 114
43% 73.5 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 226
31% 225 Pts
64-Core 228
15% 228 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 44%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Patriot Flare 60GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM21.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 76 100 25 110 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 303
Write 106
Mixed 130
SusWrite 67.1
33% 152 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 9.8
81% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 83
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 63.7
58% 86.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2010)-$32
23GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 60 61 61 62 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 49.9
Write 47.3
Mixed 37.4
SusWrite 60.5
36% 48.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Toshiba 9905624-010.A00G CT4G4SFS8266.C8FF 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
31.7% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 13.7
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 4.6
15% 5.23 GB/s
Latency 167
24% 167 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical J4105B-ITX Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock J4105B-ITX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback