| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 0.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock G31M-S. (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20090708 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 08 '19 at 13:18 |
| Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
| Run User | HUN-User |
| Background CPU | 12% |
PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
41.1%
Average
|
37% 51.2 Pts
|
7% 53.2 Pts
|
3% 53.7 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ATI Radeon HD 2400-PRO
Gigabyte(1458 216A) 256MB
Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.632.1.2000
|
0.58%
Terrible
|
0% 0.89 fps
|
1% 0.81 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD WD1600AVJS-63SWA0 160GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 58.01D58
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 37 36 15 44 54 MB/s
|
27.2%
Poor
|
34% 46.1 MB/s
|
155% 1.2 MB/s
| |
|
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71
464GB free
Firmware: PB4OC60F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 72 77 76 78 78 MB/s
|
44.7%
Average
|
50% 67.9 MB/s
|
136% 0.9 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM SDRAM
|
19.6%
Very poor
|
17% 6.07 GB/s
|
16% 5.73 GB/s
|
43% 92.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical G31M-S. Builds (Compare 99 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock G31M-S.
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 10x |
| Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 7x |
| Pentium E5300Intel $59Bench 36%, 18,604 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples | 9x |
| GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 8x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 47% - Average | Total price: $117 |