| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 79.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M4A87TD EVO (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색 |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20100519 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 07 '19 at 17:12 |
| Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
| Run User | KOR-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
64.4%
Good
|
54% 81.6 Pts
|
31% 246 Pts
|
18% 299 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.20
|
27.6%
Poor
|
28% 29.8 fps
|
27% 33.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Revuahn 900G 240GB
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1001A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 369 385 63 52 60 MB/s
|
79.9%
Very good
|
80% 356 MB/s
|
133% 48.5 MB/s
|
82% 158 MB/s
|
|
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
126GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 86 88 86 85 MB/s
|
48.8%
Average
|
58% 78.6 MB/s
|
168% 1.23 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 4GB
2GB free, PID 556b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 3.8 4.7 4.5 4.7 4.3 MB/s
|
6.31%
Terrible
|
16% 12.3 MB/s
|
44% 1.53 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 M378B1G73DB0-CK0 16GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32.6%
Below average
|
31% 10.8 GB/s
|
21% 7.5 GB/s
|
62% 64.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M4A87TD EVO Builds (Compare 136 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD EVO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 36x |
| Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples | 25x |
| Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 19x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 6x |
| R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples | 6x |
| HD 6850AMDBench 12%, 31,600 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $241 |