MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics79.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191106
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 07 '19 at 08:05
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$295
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Memory 75.8
1-Core 158
2-Core 314
97% 183 Pts
4-Core 613
8-Core 1,138
105% 875 Pts
64-Core 1,502
93% 1,502 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.6% Very good
Lighting 97.9
Reflection 110
Parallax 93.5
80% 100 fps
MRender 97.1
Gravity 94.2
Splatting 98.2
79% 96.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
141GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 196 197 201 201 200 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 370
Write 365
Mixed 317
SusWrite 198
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 43.8
145% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 215
161% 216 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
472GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 199 199 196 195 197 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 372
Write 371
Mixed 357
SusWrite 197
73% 324 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 80.6
4K Mixed 50.7
166% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 218
162% 216 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 133%
WD Gold 8TB (256MB Cache 2017)-$189
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01H02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 170 170 162 157 167 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 109
Write 118
Mixed 79.6
SusWrite 164
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 1.3
288% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 124%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60
582GB free
Firmware: MJAOA5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 97 97 98 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 89.7
Write 96
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 97.2
53% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 92%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249
1.5TB free
Firmware: MN6OAA10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 150 155 153 154 155 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 140
Write 141
Mixed 74.9
SusWrite 154
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D32AESE.M16FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.3% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 30.3
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 28.7
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,666 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $951
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback