Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2720QM-$85 7,798 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Memory 87.5 1-Core 85.6 2-Core 166 67% 113 Pts	4-Core 282 8-Core 404 43% 343 Pts	64-Core 404 25% 404 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 4200M 6,825 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Dell(1028 0493) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 327.62 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	2.04% Terrible	Lighting 2.43 Reflection 2.96 Parallax 1.91 2% 2.43 fps	MRender 3.14 Gravity 2.37 Splatting 2.48 2% 2.66 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.04% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM810 2.5" 7mm 256GB 2,811 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: AXM0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 185 68 45 35 43 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	34.5% Below average	Read 223 Write 220 Mixed 126 SusWrite 98.4 37% 167 MB/s	4K Read 10.7 4K Write 31.5 4K Mixed 13.2 50% 18.5 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 75.2 DQ Mixed 14.9 33% 69.7 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB 15,815 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	50.8% Above average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 16.1 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 16 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 70 57% 70 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	1,632x
NVS 4200MNvidiaBench 2%, 6,825 samples	355x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	149x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	76x
M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,983 samples	73x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	64x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $62

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16